Skip to content

Tim Hendrickson

My feedback

7 results found

  1. 22 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  2. 60 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  3. 252 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim Hendrickson commented  · 

    I'm glad this is "planned" as of December 2025, but is there any kind of timeline for this being implemented? It's nearly a year later, and 3.5 years since the initial request was made.

    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim Hendrickson commented  · 

    This is my most used function of classic IOM. Having the ability to simply run a list against what's in the database and not upload anything is incredibly useful. I use this primarily for lists we receive of conference attendees where we need to find out who was or will be there that we know. I run dozens of these cross-referencing comparison imports per year.

    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  5. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Omatic Cloud  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Tim Hendrickson commented  · 

    When uncertain what you need to do with a set of data, it would be nice to move that into a labeled holding bucket.

    Here's my scenario:
    I've found that some of my data looks like other records in RE, but is actually a new person. Unfortunately the data I have is insufficient to create new records and requires some discussion before I can do anything with it. Currently I'm having to delete them from either of the 1:1 or 1:X lists and mark them on my upload sheet. Leaving them in their existing buckets just clutters up those buckets.

    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  · 
  7. 170 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Tim Hendrickson supported this idea  ·