Skip to content

Stu Manewith

My feedback

13 results found

  1. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks JPP for the idea.  We can look at providing the file name as a field that you could choose to use as desired, including using the field as part of a batch description that you could be dynamically building.

    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Omatic Cloud » Post to GL  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  4. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  6. 7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  7. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    Another less elegant option, which would still be an improvement, would be to output all data associated with a single transaction on a single row. Right now the data elements are segregated into 3 separated rows: first the basic j/e row data, then the project distribution and classification row data, and finally the transaction code row data. Troubleshooting errors would be easier if all of a transaction's data were output on the same row.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    As we implement P2GL for more and more FE NXT clients, we need a better way to test our outputs. Most clients are live in FE NXT and don't have test systems; furthermore, there is no 'pre-post' option, when a formula is run, it creates a live journal entry batch in FE NXT. We need a way to look at a pre-post report or file or some other mechanism to see and validate (or refine) the results of FE NXT formulas before delivering them to the client. An option such as a .csv output file would be very useful.

    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  8. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Omatic Cloud » Post to GL  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    We need a way to identify who (which user) created and last changed a P2GL (including POM) formula. We also need an audit trail to identify who may have deleted a P2GL formula.

    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  9. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    I am still very much struggling with this issue. I'm working with a Strategic client who processes both online and offline gifts coming over from Salesforce -- but their current focus is processing offline gifts while we work out some kinks with online. The majority of gifts are online, so a skip row function removes them, but also removes all the sample data coming through -- and our P2GL filtering is not yet sophisticated enough to allow me to pull in only offline gifts. I really need some help here.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    This is becoming a more pervasive and challenging issue as we continue to work with more Salesforce customers for Post-to-GL. Because of the need to skip rows within a formula because of inadequate front-end filtering, we don't get ANY sample data at all, and, therefore, need to run the formula and then examine the output, iteratively, in order to test and refine the formula logic.

    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  11. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Omatic Cloud  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stu Manewith commented  · 

    'Between' would also be a very useful logic operator.

    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Stu Manewith supported this idea  · 
    Stu Manewith shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base